The Nature of Time - II

Oxal and Hatonn

Continuing from my last post. This is from a session on August 1st, 1973.

Oxal states,

“It would, however, be much better to eliminate from the individual’s consciousness preconceived notions of the nature of both time and space, for they are not what they seem to be, as depicted by their phenomena within the boundaries of your present limitations.”

I will also briefly state that Oxal is my second favorite personality, behind Q’uo.

This discussion reminds me of Dewey Larson’s reciprocal theory of the universe. Not to bore people with physics, but in essence Dewey’s theory centers around space and time having an inverse relationship. And that matter and motion are manifestations of the dynamics between time and space. In mainstream physics the current system says that motion is independent of time and space. That time and space are in the “background”. Oxal touches on this in the below quotes:

“Time is a field. It is space-dependent. Space is a field and is time-dependent. For this reason you recognize a reciprocal nature.”

“As you have recently stated, time and space are dependent, one upon another.”

I have been studying history recently and have noticed how some of these historical figures have multifaceted lives and careers. Here’s an excerpt from Wikipedia about Thomas Jefferson:

“Thomas Jefferson was an American statesman, diplomat, lawyer, architect, philosopher, and Founding Father who served as the third president of the United States from 1801 to 1809. He was the primary author of the Declaration of Independence.”

And here we are, the modern man, struggling to balance his life with his one job. You can see this same pattern across many prominent historical figures. These recent revelations have inspired me somewhat, kindling a new fire within to open myself to take on more responsibility and endeavors. I was already working. Then I started going to school and pursuing higher “education”. I have joined a couple spiritual groups as I recently felt I’ve wanted to connect with like minded people. I am probably going to start tutoring at the Writing Center for my university. And I’ve also committed myself to writing more on my sub stack and continuing my personal studies of the Law of One. All of that, on top of all the normal daily activities I like to do: Qi Gong, yoga, exercise, meditation, reading, writing. It’s becoming quite a lot to balance ! But I know that I can handle it and that it will pay off in the long run. It’s fascinating too, because previously I felt like I was doing enough just with school and work. And that I had a good balance. As soon as I made the decision in my head that I was going to start taking on a lot more, it’s like everything started to open up more. More “time” became available in a sense. And the universe sensing this, brought more opportunities for me almost immediately.

Oxal makes an enormous declaration here, and it would be well worth to ponder and consider this:

“There are six spaces and six times in each density. In your present form and state of awareness you recognize three. The other three you travel in in the state of sleep. In doing this. you become, quite often, mismatched with your awareness you possess in your waking state.”

We only recognize 3 spaces and times during our waking, conscious state. However, according to Oxal we travel through the other three during our sleep state. The quote itself feels a little wobbly syntax wise. What I take from it is that we are able to move through time and space in irregular ways than we are used to in our waking state. They go on to give an example of how people can predict or experience the future in their dreams. This has to do, again, with our relationship with space and time. We see time as a clock, continuously moving in a direction that appears linearly to us. But, let me say this: isn’t “linearly” a two-dimensional concept? We see and experience time as if it were a two-dimensional line. But we know time and space are at least three dimensional. So, what is the three dimensional version of linearly? I suppose, it would be a vector.

Vectors can move in three dimensions, but how does that manifest with time? I can’t say that I fully know the answer to that question, I would contemplate and meditate on this concept to try to get a sense of how it may work…

Coming Up:

Oxal, “Space may be thought of as linear, if time is thought of as volumetric. Or you may reverse the process, as you do within your limitation, and consider space volumetric and time linear. Either is true.”